Microfoundations of Strategic Decision Rationality in M&R : A Dyadic Investigation between Germany and China

Arnold, Nicole (2020) Microfoundations of Strategic Decision Rationality in M&R : A Dyadic Investigation between Germany and China. PhD thesis, University of Gloucestershire. doi:10.46289/KJ99WE45

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have become one of the primary strategies to increase corporate wealth but often fail to reach expected targets. While the notion of the bounded-rational man has been emphasised, the microfoundations of executives` factual decision-making processing, cognition and behaviour remain a source of debate. Extant research presents scattered, mostly unilateral studies and leaves a bridge to further explore and connect the disparate determinants that effect executives` level of rationality and organisational judgement in the complex realm of M&A. Data was collected from a sample of 30 senior M&A executives and consultants from Germany and China through semi-structured interviews. Within the post-positivist paradigm, the qualitative study employs a phenomenological approach and extends the theoretical framework with data from the lived experiences of these strategic decision-makers. Executives` mental and observable characteristics become explicit in the interfering circumstances and dependencies of M&A decision specifics in which these are deployed. In the dyadic perspective, findings highlight an experience-intuitive, a socio-structural, and a risk-dynamic path as significant in executives` strategic decisions, where ego becomes the enemy of rationality and societal norms its friend. A dynamic typology of behavioural momentum is then developed, proposing seven dimensions that direct non-rational behaviour in strategic M&A decision-making. This framework, grounded in system theory and dual-process models, summarises the relevant cues that affect the ease of perception and evaluation of realities which subsequently promote the relative dominance of cognition over rationale in such decisions. The conclusions emphasise that SDM models would be more complete when considering the underlying microfoundations of executive`s (inter-)actions in a content- and context-sensitive manner pertaining to the environment, organisation, target, decision practices and their interdependencies. It is also argued that conscious reflection of experiential perspectives becomes a necessary competence of decision-makers and top management teams (TMTs) to improve their business practice.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Thesis Advisors:
Thesis AdvisorEmailURL
Sanchez Bengoa, Doloresdsanchezbengoa@glos.ac.ukhttps://www.glos.ac.uk/staff/profile/dolores-sanchez-bengoa/
Ryan, Bobbryan@glos.ac.ukhttps://www.glos.ac.uk/staff/profile/bob-ryan/
Uncontrolled Keywords: Mergers and acquisitions; Bounded rationality; Decision-making; Strategic decisions; Dual-process model; Microfoundations; System theory
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance > HG4001 Finance management. Business finance
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > Gloucestershire Business School > Law, Accounting and Finance
Depositing User: Susan Turner
Date Deposited: 16 Feb 2022 15:15
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2022 15:15
URI: https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/10701

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.