Adams-White, Jade E., Wheatcroft, Jacqueline M. ORCID: 0000-0001-7212-1598 and Jump, Michael (2018) Measuring decision accuracy and confidence of mock air defence operators. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7 (1). pp. 60-39. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.01.005
|
Text (Peer-reviewed version)
6074 - Wheatcroft - 2018 - Measuring decision accuracy and confidence.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (276kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study aimed to understand more fully some of the factors that influence decisions as related to air defence in a naval vessel's operation room. The study considered the impact of decision criticality (DC) and task load (TL) on measures of accuracy, confidence, and within-subjects confidence-accuracy (W-S C-A; a measure of metacognition). Personality constructs, workload, and situational awareness were also assessed. Participants were allocated to either a high, moderate, or low TL condition. Each took part in a computer-generated simulated air defence scenario where they were required to make a range of decisions and provide a corresponding confidence rating for each decision taken. Results showed that low DC increased confidence in decisions and high DC increased decision accuracy. Thus, DC significantly impacts decision confidence and decision accuracy. In addition, those less tolerant of ambiguity were less accurate in their decision-making. Future studies should take account of these factors.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Article Type: | Article |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Decision-making; Command and control; Military; Metacognition |
Related URLs: | |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology U Military Science > U Military Science (General) |
Divisions: | Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science |
Research Priority Areas: | Health, Life Sciences, Sport and Wellbeing |
Depositing User: | Rhiannon Goodland |
Date Deposited: | 11 Oct 2018 10:51 |
Last Modified: | 31 Aug 2023 09:04 |
URI: | https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/6074 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record