Within- and Among-Observer Variation in Measurements of Animal Biometrics and their Influence on Accurate Quantification of Common Biometric-Based Condition Indices

Goodenough, Anne E ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7662-6670, Stafford, Richard, Catlin-Groves, Christina L, Smith, Angela L and Hart, Adam G ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4795-9986 (2010) Within- and Among-Observer Variation in Measurements of Animal Biometrics and their Influence on Accurate Quantification of Common Biometric-Based Condition Indices. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 47 (5). pp. 323-334. doi:10.5735/086.047.0503

[thumbnail of Coversheet  Within- and Among-Observer Variation in Measurements of Animal Biometrics.pdf]
Preview
Text
Coversheet Within- and Among-Observer Variation in Measurements of Animal Biometrics.pdf - Draft Version

Download (88kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Within- and Among-Observer Variation in Measurements of Animal Biometrics.pdf] Text
Within- and Among-Observer Variation in Measurements of Animal Biometrics.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (293kB)

Abstract

Research using biometric data relies on consistent measurements within, and often among, observers. However, research into the relative importance of intra- and inter-observer variability is limited. More importantly, the influence of biometric variability on accurate quantification of biometric-based condition indices has not been analysed: it is unclear whether multiple errors become magnified or cancel one another out. Here, we quantify intra- and inter-specific variability in multiple biometrics, and derived condition indices, using museum bird specimens. Inter-observer variability was higher than intra-observer variability for all parameters. Measurement error (ME) varied from < 1% to > 50% for different biometrics. ME was magnified in condition estimates, reaching > 80% within-observers and > 90% among-observers. Significant differences in mean measurements were found for 17% and 67% of biometrics within-and among-observers, respectively; for condition indices, the figures were 50% and 67%, respectively. We discuss the implications of these findings for research into species' ecology, taxonomy and behaviour.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education, Health and Sciences
Research Priority Areas: Place, Environment and Community
Depositing User: Anne Goodenough
Date Deposited: 03 May 2016 13:06
Last Modified: 17 Apr 2026 08:15
URI: https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/3345

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.