The tension between competing statutory obligations in the granting of parental orders: A systematic review of the case law

Park-Morton, Lottie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-7611 (2026) The tension between competing statutory obligations in the granting of parental orders: A systematic review of the case law. Common Law World Review. doi:10.1177/14737795261434019 (In Press)

Preview	Text (Published version) 15948 Park-Morton (2026) The tension between competing statutory obligations.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0. Download (347kB) | Preview
	Text (Peer-reviewed version) 15948 Park-Morton, L (2026) The tension between competing statutory obligations in the granting of parental orders.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (420kB)

Abstract

This article critically examines the judicial approach to granting parental orders following surrogacy under s 54 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 in England and Wales. Whilst the child's welfare is the court's paramount consideration, the statutory requirements of s 54 can, at times, conflict with this principle. Through a systematic review of the case law, this article explores how courts have navigated the tension between fulfilling statutory obligations and guaranteeing the lifelong welfare of the child. It reveals that certain s 54 criteria – such as time limits, the home requirement, and restrictions on payments – have been interpreted flexibly to prioritise welfare, whilst others – including the genetic link requirement and surrogate's consent – remain rigidly applied, occasionally to the detriment of the child's welfare. The analysis highlights the doctrinal and legal incoherence that arises when courts are forced to reconcile competing statutory duties. This tension must be recognised and reflected in any reform of the law. The findings offer valuable insights for jurisdictions considering surrogacy regulation and underscore the need for a coherent legal framework that enables courts to make welfare-driven decisions without statutory compromise.

Item Type:	Article
Article Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Surrogacy; Parenthood; Parental orders; Welfare
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Schools and Research Institutes > School of Business, Computing and Social Sciences
Depositing User:	Kamila Niekoraniec
Date Deposited:	13 Apr 2026 09:54
Last Modified:	14 Apr 2026 08:00
URI:	https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/15948

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record