Effectiveness of the Activate injury prevention exercise programme to prevent injury in schoolboy rugby union

Barden, Craig ORCID: 0000-0001-5504-2548, Hancock, Matthew V, Stokes, Keith A ORCID: 0000-0002-5049-2838, Roberts, Simon P and McKay, Carly D (2022) Effectiveness of the Activate injury prevention exercise programme to prevent injury in schoolboy rugby union. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56. pp. 812-817. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-105170

Preview

Text (Peer Reviewed Version © the Authors) 10955 Barden et al (2022) Effectiveness-of-the-Activate-injury-prevention-exercise-programme-to-prevent-injury-in-schoolboy-rugby-union.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0. Download (451kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective The efficacious Activate injury prevention exercise programme has been shown to prevent injuries in English schoolboy rugby union. There is now a need to assess the implementation and effectiveness of Activate in the applie setting. Methods This quasi-experimental study used a 24-hour time-loss injury definition to calculate incidence (/1000 hours) and burden (days lost/1000 hours) for individuals whose teams adopted Activate (used Activate during season) versus non-adopters. The dose-response relationship of varying levels of Activate adherence (median Activate sessions per week) was also assessed. Player-level rugby exposure, sessional Activate adoption and injury reports were recorded by school gatekeepers. Rate ratios (RR), adjusted by cluster (team), were calculated using backwards stepwise Poisson regression to compare rates between adoption and adherence groups. Results Individuals in teams adopting Activate had a 23% lower match injury incidence (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.07), 59% lower training injury incidence (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.97) and 26% lower match injury burden (95% CI 0.46 to 1.20) than individuals on non-adopting teams. Individuals with high Activate adherence (>= 3 sessions per week) had a 67% lower training injury incidence (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.91) and a 32% lower match injury incidence (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92) than individuals with low adherence (<1 session per week). While 65% of teams adopted Activate during the season, only one team used Activate three times per week, using whole phases and programme progressions. Conclusion Activate is effective at preventing injury in English schoolboy rugby. Attention should focus on factors influencing programme uptake and implementation, ensuring Activate can have maximal benefit.

Item Type:	Article
Article Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Rugby; Athletic Injuries; Preventive Medicine; Adolescent; Risk; Football; Coaches; Designs; Tackle; Sport; Ban
Subjects:	G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Divisions:	Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science
Research Priority Areas:	Health, Life Sciences, Sport and Wellbeing
Depositing User:	Kate Greenaway
Date Deposited:	28 Apr 2022 10:55
Last Modified:	31 Aug 2023 09:06
URI:	https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/10955

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record