Nawlo, Mohammed, Alkaraan, Fadi ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-5692 and Katalo, Hasan Radwan
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-455X
(2026)
Portfolio Optimisation in the Digital Economy: A Treynor–Black Approach.
Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19 (8).
p. 563.
doi:10.3390/jrfm19080563
Preview |
Text
16517 Nawlo, Mohammed et al. (2026) Portfolio Optimisation in the Digital Economy_A Treynor–Black Approach.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (999kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Digital transformation is reshaping industries, business models, and investment opportunities, creating new challenges for international portfolio management. The European communication services sector has become a strategic component of the digital economy, driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI), digital platforms, 5G infrastructure, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and data-driven business models. Despite its importance, limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of portfolio optimisation strategies within digitally transforming sectors. This study investigates international portfolio optimisation using constituent firms of the MSCI Europe Communication Services 35/20 Capped Index. Drawing upon Modern Portfolio Theory and the Treynor–Black framework, an actively managed portfolio is constructed and evaluated against the SPDR® MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF and an equal-weight portfolio. Using daily market data, the analysis estimates asset returns, alpha and beta coefficients, portfolio weights, and risk-adjusted performance measures, including the Sharpe and Treynor ratios. Paired-samples t-tests are employed to assess the statistical significance of performance differences among investment strategies. The findings show that the Treynor–Black portfolio generated the highest annual return (27.32%), outperforming both the benchmark and equal-weight portfolios, and the highest percentage of Sharpe ratios (1.2159), suggesting that diversification benefits outweighed the advantages of active security selection. Hypothesis testing indicates no statistically significant difference between the Treynor–Black and equal-weight portfolios, and no statistically significant difference exists between the proposed and benchmark portfolios. The study extends the international portfolio management literature by applying the Treynor–Black model to a digitally transforming sector. The findings suggest that portfolio performance is influenced not only by firm-level financial characteristics but also by broader digital and institutional environments. Firms operating within digitally advanced and well-governed economies appear better positioned to exploit technological innovation and generate sustainable long-term value. Overall, the results demonstrate that successful international portfolio optimization requires balancing active security selection with diversification while recognizing the role of digital transformation, governance quality, and innovation ecosystems in shaping investment performance within the digital economy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Article Type: | Article |
| Additional Information: | This article belongs to the Special Issue Maximizing Sustainable Performance: AI & FinTech-Driven Innovation Strategies |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | International portfolio optimisation; Artificial intelligence (AI); Digital transformation; Governance; Communication services sector; Treynor–Black model; International diversification; Portfolio performance; MSCI Europe Communication Services Index |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5001 Business > HF5717 Business communication Q Science > Q Science (General) > Q336 Artificial intelligence |
| Divisions: | Schools and Research Institutes > School of Business, Computing and Social Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Kamila Niekoraniec |
| Date Deposited: | 10 Sep 2026 13:28 |
| Last Modified: | 10 Sep 2026 13:30 |
| URI: | https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/16517 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

Tools
Tools