The acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy of a physical and social activity intervention ‘BreatheHappy’ for people with long-term respiratory conditions: A feasibility study

Lewis, A, Turner, Louise A ORCID: 0000-0002-0153-7075, Fryer, Simon M ORCID: 0000-0003-0376-0104, Smith, R, Dillerstone, H, Patrick, Yuet Wah and Bevan-Smith, Elaine ORCID: 0000-0002-9636-5367 (2024) The acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy of a physical and social activity intervention ‘BreatheHappy’ for people with long-term respiratory conditions: A feasibility study. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 21. pp. 1-15. doi:10.1177/14799731241238435

Preview

Text 13900 Lewis et al (2024) The acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy of a physical and social activity intervention BreatheHappy.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (655kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a group-based pilot programme of low-to-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities, by investigating acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy testing. We offer suggestions on programme adaptions for future study. Methods People with a range of chronic respiratory diseases were invited to participate in a pilot 12 week group activity programme. Activities included outdoor walking, tai-chi, education and a range of social activities. Acceptability was determined by participant experiences determined during interviews. Practicality was determined by programme and outcome measure completion, cost and adverse events. Implementation was determined according to whether the programme ran as planned. Efficacy was determined by statistical analyses of outcomes including hand grip strength, timed up and go test, COPD Helplessness Index, COPD Assessment Test, and measures of physical activity via accelerometry. Results Thematic analysis indicated that the “BreatheHappy” programme was acceptable. Seven of nine participants completed eight out of 10 sessions and the majority completed all outcome measures. “BreatheHappy” was therefore considered practical. The programme was not implemented as planned, with only 10 sessions running rather than the 12 intended. There was a significant increase in daily step counts (MD: 1284 95% CI: 240-2329 p: 0.024 effect size: 0.988), stepping time (MD: 16 min 95% CI: 5-27 min p: 0.011 effect size: 1.36) and daily minutes completing light physical activity (MD: 23 95% CI: 6-38 p: 0.006 effect size: 1.6). However, time spent sitting for ≥30 min but ≤60 min significantly increased (MD: 26 95% CI: 0.2-52 min p: 0.049 effect size: 0.931), showing signs of efficacy and changing physical activity behaviour patterns. Discussion A 10-week programme of low-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities shows signs of feasibility for future research. Suggested adaptions for future study include using physical activity measures such as daily step count or light physical activity for a primary outcome, and mental health and social health related outcome measures relatable to participant's beneficial experiences of the programme. Recruitment in future studies will try and reach both those less socially active and possibly those who have completed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Venues should be close to efficient transport links whilst different frequencies and durations of programme delivery should be trialled. Adequate funding should be provided for both staff running the programme and blinded research staff for outcome measurement.

Item Type:	Article
Article Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Pulmonary rehabilitation; Physical activity; Sedentary behaviour; Qualitative
Subjects:	G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure L Education > L Education (General) Q Science > QP Physiology Q Science > QP Physiology > QP301.H75 Physiology. Sport R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Divisions:	Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science
Research Priority Areas:	Health, Life Sciences, Sport and Wellbeing
Depositing User:	Charlotte Crutchlow
Date Deposited:	04 Apr 2024 12:59
Last Modified:	04 Apr 2024 13:00
URI:	https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/13900

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record