Hafferty, Caitlin ORCID: 0000-0002-4512-1338, Berry, Robert ORCID: 0000-0002-7714-5211 and Ordford, S (2021) Geo-information tools for stakeholder engagement in environmental decision-making: “best practice” recommendations from a UK case study. In: 29th GIS Research UK Annual Conference, 14th to 16th April 2021, Online (Cardiff).
|
Text (Published version)
9625-Berry-(2021)-Geo-information-tools-for-stakeholder-engagement.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (203kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper provides knowledge and recommendations for the “best practice” use of information, communication, and collaboration technologies for stakeholder engagement in UK-based planning and environmental decision-making. Tackling complex environmental issues requires inclusive and participatory decision-making processes, however current frameworks overlook the impact of technology on achieving positive outcomes. We conduct a two-stage study (including a survey, N = 58; and semi-structured interviews, N = 38) to capture experts’ experiences of engagement during the Covid-19 pandemic. Results offer a snapshot into the use of participatory geo-information tools – highlighting key challenges and considerations for policymakers and practitioners.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4665809 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Public and stakeholder engagement; Participatory geo-information tools; Environmental decision-making; Best practice; UK |
Related URLs: | |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GA Mathematical geography. Cartography S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General) > S589.75 Agriculture and the environment |
Divisions: | Schools and Research Institutes > Countryside and Community Research Institute |
Research Priority Areas: | Place, Environment and Community |
Depositing User: | Ella Rowe |
Date Deposited: | 05 May 2021 08:24 |
Last Modified: | 03 Feb 2022 17:01 |
URI: | https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/9625 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record