Shaw, Sarah ORCID: 0000-0003-0723-8057, Smith, Tina, Alexanders, Jenny, Shaw, Thomas, Smith, Lois, Nevill, Alan and Anderson, Anna (2017) The Use of Recovery Strategies Among Participants of the Bupa Great North Run: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 26 (6). pp. 478-485. doi:10.1123/jsr.2016-0029
Text (Peer reviewed version)
Henderson 2016 The Use and Perceptions of Recovery Strategies Among Participants the of The BUPA Great North Run.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 January 9999. (Other reason). Available under License All Rights Reserved. Download (553kB) |
||
|
Text (Peer reviewed version)
4283 Shaw (2017) The Use and Perceptions of Recovery Strategies.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License All Rights Reserved. Download (499kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective: To investigate half marathon runners’ frequency of use of recovery strategies, perceptions regarding the most beneficial recovery strategy and reasons for using recovery strategies. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: 186 participants of the 13.1 mile BUPA Great North Run 2013. Methods: A questionnaire was developed which required participants to indicate how frequently they used twelve different recovery strategies, identify which recovery strategy they believed to be most beneficial and rank six reasons for using recovery strategies in order of importance. Data was analysed using a Friedman non-parametric ANOVA and additional non-parametric tests. Results: All participants used recovery strategies. Stretching was the most commonly used recovery strategy (p < 0.001), whereas the use of nutritional supplements was the most commonly selected most beneficial recovery strategy. Over 50% of respondents indicated that they never used strategies such as kinesio tape (80%), hydrotherapy (78%) or ice baths (71%). A significant difference was observed between reasons for using recovery strategy (χ2 (5) = 292.29, p < 0.001). Reducing muscle tightness (rank 4.87) and reducing injury (rank 4.35), were the most frequently chosen most important reasons for using recovery strategies, minor sex and age differences in the responses were identified. Conclusion: Recovery strategy usage appears to be widespread among half marathon runners; however disparities exist between the frequency of use and perceived effectiveness of different recovery strategies. Further research in this area is needed to facilitate the development of recovery strategy guidelines which are both evidence-based and practically relevant.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Article Type: | Article |
Additional Information: | Accepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2017, volume 26 (6): pp478-485, http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2016-0029 © Human Kinetics, Inc. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Recovery, Running, Stretching, Survey |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports > GV1060 Track and field athletics |
Divisions: | Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science |
Research Priority Areas: | Health, Life Sciences, Sport and Wellbeing |
Depositing User: | Susan Turner |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jan 2017 10:28 |
Last Modified: | 31 Aug 2023 09:08 |
URI: | https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/4283 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record