Thompson, N, Roberts, W, Hughes, J and De Ste Croix, Mark B ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-4355
(2026)
Coach learning and club environment shape behaviour towards implementing training load and maturation monitoring practices in UK professional youth football academies.
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching.
doi:10.1177/17479541261496197
(In Press)
Preview |
Text
16575 Thompson et al (2026) Coach Learning and club environment.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher's Licence Non-Commercial Use. Download (297kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
16575 Thompson at al (2026) Figure 1.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher's Licence Non-Commercial Use. Download (122kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
16575 Thompson et al (2026) Table 1.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher's Licence Non-Commercial Use. Download (63kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore how UK professional youth football coaches construct knowledge and integrate training load and maturation monitoring into their coaching practice. Eleven experienced (≥5 yrs) coaches working with players in the youth development and/or foundation phase, from a range of elite player performance plan category clubs (1–3), were purposively sampled based on their coaching experience and qualifications. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and coding was carried out using NVivo v12. An inductive, reflexive, thematic analysis was employed to analyse transcripts, and three themes were identified: 1. coach learning, 2. club environment, and 3. coach behaviour. Coaches predominantly constructed their knowledge through formal youth athlete coaching qualifications, sports-related higher education degrees, and informal learning opportunities facilitated within club environments that promoted interdisciplinary collaboration. How coaches learn, and the environments in which they operate, appear to shape behaviour, with effective communication playing a crucial role in supporting decision-making based on monitoring data. Category two and three status coaches reported a lack of human resources, poor knowledge exchange, and limited communication between coaches and sports scientists as a barrier to using training load and maturation monitoring data. Interdisciplinary practices, non-formal continuing professional development programmes and frequent communication facilitated the implementation of monitoring practices within category one clubs. These findings contribute a novel coach-centred perspective by revealing how formal, non-formal, and informal learning experiences shape coaches’ monitoring knowledge, while identifying the environmental conditions and interdisciplinary practices that facilitate or constrain the implementation of training load and maturation monitoring.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Article Type: | Article |
| Additional Information: | https://www.sagepub.com/journals/permissions/posting-to-an-institutional-repository-green-open-access |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | maturity; soccer; athlete monitoring; youth adolescence; coaching practice |
| Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports > GV0711 Coaching G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports > GV861 Ball games: Baseball, football, golf, etc. |
| Divisions: | Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education, Health and Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Charlotte Crutchlow |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2026 09:13 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Oct 2026 09:15 |
| URI: | https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/16575 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

Tools
Tools