Considering biophilic tendencies when operationalising nature as medicine: a critical review

Stonebridge, Natasha ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-1505, Sumner, Rachel C and Scott, Sam ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5951-4749 (2025) Considering biophilic tendencies when operationalising nature as medicine: a critical review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 105. art: 102678. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102678

[thumbnail of 15181 Stonebridge, Sumner, Scott (2025) Considering biophilic tendencies when operationalising nature as medicine - a critical review.pdf] Text
15181 Stonebridge, Sumner, Scott (2025) Considering biophilic tendencies when operationalising nature as medicine - a critical review.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 July 2027. (Publisher Embargo).
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (268kB)

Abstract

This critical review adds to the rapidly expanding field of nature-health research and specifically its advancement towards defining and operationalising a ‘dose’ of nature required to support mental health. There is a wealth of literature to draw upon across broad areas of research where evidence of the restorative benefits of a relationship with nature is provided in order to design nature-based health interventions. However, due to variations in approach, support for nature to be salutogenic is a challenge to conceptualise. Drawing on theory to help develop a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of how interactions with nature support and improve wellbeing, the present review collates, describes and appraises tools designed to make sense of human-nature connection. Tools were evaluated in their ability to provide context to understanding factors associated with wellbeing, alongside their utility and relevance to work in the associated field. Importantly, drawing on the Bioavailability Model, the present work provides recommendations for the use of nature connection tools in future research, along with other considerations for understanding and contextualising discrepancies in the potential benefit of nature on prescription and its conceptualisation.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Health; Wellbeing; Green prescriptions; Nature-based interventions; Biophilia; Nature affiliation; Nature connection; Measurements
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science
Depositing User: Anna Kerr
Date Deposited: 18 Jul 2025 14:45
Last Modified: 18 Jul 2025 15:00
URI: https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/15181

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.