Fatigue management: a systematic review of objective measurement techniques for cognitive fatigue

Dickens, Alicia, Champion, Andrew J. and Schenke, Kimberley C ORCID: 0000-0002-1184-4802 (2024) Fatigue management: a systematic review of objective measurement techniques for cognitive fatigue. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. pp. 1-18. doi:10.1080/13803395.2024.2415070 (In Press)

Text 14462 Schenke et al (2024) Fatigue management.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 17 October 2025. (Publisher Embargo). Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (608kB)

Abstract

Background: Cognitive fatigue is a complex psychobiological state whereby task performancecannot be maintained. Return-to-work protocols typically rely on self-report measures, thereforethe current systematic review aimed to identify “real-time” measures of objective cognitive fatigueto inform return-to-work protocols.Methods: Studies were included if participants were at least 18 years old, assessed “real-time”objective cognitive fatigue that could be used outside of the lab (neuroimaging measures were,therefore, excluded), used an induction task that was separate to the measurement, were ade-quately powered, compared objective cognitive fatigue at baseline and post-induction, andincluded a cognitive fatigue induction task that was at least 30 minutes long.Nine electronic databases were searched until 31 December 2022 (MEDLINE; PsychArticle;PubMED, ProQuest; ProQuest for gray literature; Google Scholar; The Cochrane Library; TheHealth Technology Assessment Database; and Web of Science), with alerts set up on GoogleScholar to notify of new relevant research since this date (reviewed until December 2023). Thechecklist for quasi-experimental studies (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2014) was used to assess the riskof bias. Whilst a meta-analysis was planned, the data were unsuitable so only a narrative synthesiswas conducted.Results: Fifty-seven studies were included, which were conducted within a variety of settingsincluding naturalistic work scenarios, driving, aviation, and artificial computer-based tasks.Whilst the review found a range of potential measurements, there were inconsistencies infindings across studies highlighting the need for more research into the reliable measurement ofobjective cognitive fatigue in natural settings.Discussion: The findings suggest that eye- and body-related measures may be sensitive measuresof objective cognitive fatigue. However, comparisons across measurement types should be cau-tiously interpreted because eye-related and cognitive measures were far more common. Thereview highlighted the need for more consistent and transparent reporting across the field toadvance our understanding of cognitive fatigue

Item Type:	Article
Article Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Cognitive fatigue; Mental fatigue; Return to work; Return to meaningful occupation; Return to activity
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology Q Science > Q Science (General)
Divisions:	Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science
Depositing User:	Charlotte Crutchlow
Date Deposited:	23 Oct 2024 10:44
Last Modified:	23 Oct 2024 10:45
URI:	https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/14462

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record