Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management

Bickerton, Katherine T ORCID: 0000-0002-8279-6166, Ewen, John G, Canessa, Stefano, Cole, Nik C, Frost, Fay, Mootoocurpen, Rouben and McCrea, Rachel (2023) Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management. Ecological Applications, 33 (8). e2918. doi:10.1002/eap.2918

13990 Bickerton, Ewen, Canessa, Cole, Frost, Mootoocurpen, McCrea (2023) Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview


Mark–recapture surveys are commonly used to monitor translocated populations globally. Data gathered are then used to estimate demographic parameters, such as abundance and survival, using Jolly–Seber (JS) models. However, in translocated populations initial population size is known and failure to account for this may bias parameter estimates, which are important for informing conservation decisions during population establishment. Here, we provide methods to account for known initial population size in JS models by incorporating a separate component likelihood for translocated individuals, using a maximum-likelihood estimation, with models that can be fitted using either R or MATLAB. We use simulated data and a case study of a threatened lizard species with low capture probability to demonstrate that unconstrained JS models may overestimate the size of translocated populations, especially in the early stages of post-release monitoring. Our approach corrects this bias; we use our simulations to demonstrate that overestimates of population size between 78% and 130% can occur in the unconstrained JS models when the detection probability is below 0.3 compared to 1%–8.9% for our constrained model. Our case study did not show an overestimate; however accounting for the initial population size greatly reduced error in all parameter estimates and prevented boundary estimates. Adopting the corrected JS model for translocations will help managers to obtain more robust estimates of the population sizes of translocated animals, better informing future management including reinforcement decisions, and ultimately improving translocation success.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Capture–recapture; Conservation translocation; Lesser night gecko; Mark–recapture; Nactus coindemirensis; Reintroduction
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science
Research Priority Areas: Place, Environment and Community
Depositing User: Anna Kerr
Date Deposited: 24 Apr 2024 09:47
Last Modified: 24 Apr 2024 09:47
URI: https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/13990

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.