Tools
Tools
Gandrieau, J., Schnitzler, C., Cairney, J., Keegan, R., Roberts, William M 
ORCID: 0000-0001-5736-5244, Barnett, L.M., Bentsen, P., Dudley, D.A., Raymond Sum, K.W., Venetsanou, F., Button, C., Turcotte, S., Berrigan, F., Cloes, M., Rudd, J.R., Riga, V., Mouton, A., Vašíčková, J., Blanchard, J., Mekkaoui, L., Derigny, T., Franck, N., Repond, R-M., Markovič, M., Scheuer, C. and Potdevin, F.
(2023)
Development of ELIP to Assess Physical Literacy for Emerging Adults: A Methodological and Epistemological Challenge.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 94 (4).
pp. 1169-1182.
doi:10.1080/02701367.2022.2125927
|
Text
12306 Gandrieau, Schnitzler, Cairney, Keegan, Roberts, Barnett et al (2023) Development of ELIP to Assess Physical Literacy for Emerging Adults - A Methodological and Epistemological Challenge.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (243kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
12306 Gandrieau, Schnitzler, Cairney, Keegan, Roberts, Barnett et al (2023) Supplementary material for - Development of ELIP to Assess Physical Literacy for Emerging Adults - A Methodological and Epistemological Challenge.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (646kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose: Following increased interest in physical literacy (PL), development of appropriate tools for assessment has become an important next step for its operationalization. To forward the development of such tools, the objective of this study was to build the foundations of the Évaluation de la Littératie Physique (ELIP), designed to help reduce existing tensions in approaches to PL assessment that may be resulting in a low uptake into applied settings. Methods: We followed two steps: (1) the development of the first version of ELIP by deploying a Delphi method (n = 30); and (2) the modification of items through cognitive interviews with emerging adults (n = 32). Results: The expert consensus highlighted four dimensions of PL to be assessed—physical; affective; cognitive; and social—with new perspectives, including a preference for broad motor tests over fitness. Conclusion: Results offer new insights into the assessment of emerging adults’ PL, but ELIP still requires further work concerning validity, reliability, and sensitivity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Article Type: | Article |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Assessment; Cognitive interview; Delphi method; Validation |
| Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports |
| Divisions: | Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science |
| Research Priority Areas: | Health, Life Sciences, Sport and Wellbeing |
| Depositing User: | Anna Kerr |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Feb 2023 13:36 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Feb 2024 04:15 |
| URI: | https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/12306 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record
