Face specific inversion effects provide evidence for two subtypes of developmental prosopagnosia

Bennetts, Rachel J., Gregory, Nicola J., Tree, Jeremy, Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline, Banissy, Michael J., Murray, Ebony ORCID: 0000-0003-4928-5871, Penton, Tegan and Bate, Sarah (2022) Face specific inversion effects provide evidence for two subtypes of developmental prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 174. ART 108332. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108332

Text (Peer-reviewed version)
11362 Murray, Bennetts, Gregory, Tree, DiBenardiLuft, Penton, Bate (2022) Face-specific_inversion_effects_provide_evidence_for_two_subtypes_of_developmental_prosopagnosia.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (3MB) | Preview


Many studies have attempted to identify the perceptual underpinnings of developmental prosopagnosia (DP). The majority have focused on whether holistic and configural processing mechanisms are impaired in DP. However, previous work suggests that there is substantial heterogeneity in holistic and configural processing within the DP population; further, there is disagreement as to whether any deficits are face-specific or reflect a broader perceptual deficit. This study used a data-driven approach to examine whether there are systematic patterns of variability in DP that reflect different underpinning perceptual deficits. A group of individuals with DP (N = 37) completed a cognitive battery measuring holistic/configural and featural processing in faces and non-face objects. A two-stage cluster analysis on data from the Cambridge Face Perception Test identified two subgroups of DPs. Across several tasks, the first subgroup (N = 21) showed typical patterns of holistic/configural processing (measured via inversion effects); the second (N = 16) was characterised by reduced or abolished inversion effects compared to age-matched control participants (N = 91). The subgroups did not differ on tasks measuring upright face matching, object matching, non-face holistic processing, or composite effects. These findings indicate two separable pathways to face recognition impairment, one characterised by impaired configural processing and the other potentially by impaired featural processing. Comparisons to control participants provide some preliminary evidence that the deficit in featural processing may extend to some non-face stimuli. Our results demonstrate the utility of examining both the variability between and consistency across individuals with DP as a means of illuminating our understanding of face recognition in typical and atypical populations.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Developmental prosopagnosia; Prosopagnosia; Face recognition; Face perception
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > School of Education and Science
Research Priority Areas: Health, Life Sciences, Sport and Wellbeing
Depositing User: Anna Kerr
Date Deposited: 26 Jul 2022 09:40
Last Modified: 31 Oct 2023 15:35
URI: https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/11362

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.