Videos and podcasts for delivering agricultural extension: achieving credibility, relevance, legitimacy and accessibility

Chivers, Charlotte-Anne ORCID: 0000-0003-3267-5558, Bliss, Katie ORCID: 0000-0001-6595-9456, de Boon, Auvikki ORCID: 0000-0003-0067-8877, Lishman, Lydia, Schillings, Juliette, Smith, Rachel and Rose, David Christian ORCID: 0000-0002-5249-9021 (2021) Videos and podcasts for delivering agricultural extension: achieving credibility, relevance, legitimacy and accessibility. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. doi:10.1080/1389224X.2021.1997771 (In Press)

[img]
Preview
Text (Published version)
10340-Chivers-(2021)-Videos-and-podcasts-for-delivering-agricultural-extension.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose To explore the perceived credibility, relevance, legitimacy and accessibility of videos and podcasts in farm extension. Methods A two-phase mixed methods approach consisting of a pre-COVID online survey of farmers (n = 221), farmer telephone interviews (n = 60) and in-person focus groups of farmers (n = 4) followed by an analysis of how viewers interact with Agricology videos and podcasts, a further online survey (n = 141) and online farmer focus groups (n = 4) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings If they are to be perceived as effective extension methods, videos should be short, concise, practical, advert-free and visualise how to implement a practice. Podcasts can be longer, more detailed, and allow multitasking. Both should use farmer-friendly language, be easily accessible, high quality, non-biased, and be created by someone whom farmers respect. Practical implications Helps policy-makers and extensionists understand the potential of videos and podcasts and the trade-offs in using them with other forms of extension. The findings are also of use to global advisory services seeking to offer hybridised advice as a result of the ongoing COVID pandemic. Theoretical implications Elucidates the trade-offs of using videos and podcasts when face-to-face extension is not possible and develops the CRELE framework. Originality Discusses the role of podcasts in farm extension and re-evaluates the role of videos when face-to-face extension is impossible.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVID-19; Extension; Knowledge exchange; Podcasts; Videos
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General) > S560 Farm Economics
S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General) > S589.75 Agriculture and the environment
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > Countryside and Community Research Institute
Research Priority Areas: Place, Environment and Community
Depositing User: Sofia Raseta
Date Deposited: 08 Nov 2021 14:34
Last Modified: 08 Nov 2021 14:45
URI: https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/10340

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.