Reconciling ‘Graduateness’ and Work-based Learning

Walsh, Anita and Kotzee, Ben (2010) Reconciling ‘Graduateness’ and Work-based Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (4-1). pp. 36-50. ISSN 1742-240X

[img]
Preview
Text
LATHE Contents 4.1.pdf - Published Version

Download (31kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Lathe_4-1_Walsh_Kotzee.pdf - Published Version

Download (241kB) | Preview

Abstract

The last decade has seen a development of interest in the nature of ‘graduateness’. Starting with the (former) Higher Education Quality Council’s Graduate Skills project in the mid-1990s and culminating in the current preoccupation with transferable skills, the question has been asked what the common skills or attributes are that distinguish graduates from non-graduates. In contrast with business or government’s interest in generic graduate skills, the view of graduateness within universities is very much associated with specific disciplines and undergraduate education with enculturation into a particular academic discipline. This focus on disciplinary content has posed some challenges for the design of Foundation degrees, which are intended to be a blend of academic and workplace learning, and it also reinforces the academic/vocational divide. Recently, a number of honours degrees entitled ‘Professional Studies’ have been developed; these awards are designed to offer successful Foundation degree students a route through to honours which uses work-based learning. These awards vary in content and structure but tend to be designed on the basis that generic graduate attributes, which Barrie defines ‘… as being the skills, knowledge and abilities of university graduates, beyond disciplinary content knowledge …’ (2004, p.262), can be developed outside a conventional academic discipline. This paper examines the pedagogic principles underlying the design of one work-based learning ‘top up’ programme which leads to a BSc in Professional Studies. It explores the issues involved in drawing directly on experience in the workplace as the material for higher level learning. The programme challenges conventional pedagogic approaches which are dominant in the university, and emphasises the importance of direct action and experience to learning. The authors outline the challenges which need to be addressed in programme design when moving away from a focus on disciplinary content, and explain the importance of a focus on process in reconciling graduateness and work-based learning.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Additional Information: Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (LATHE) was published by the University of Gloucestershire between 2005 and 2011. LATHE was edited by Phil Gravestock and Michele Hills. Publication has ceased, the final issue was issue No.5
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Divisions: Professional Services > Academic Development Unit
Research Priority Areas: Learning and Professional Contexts
Depositing User: Anne Pengelly
Date Deposited: 06 Sep 2016 14:06
Last Modified: 15 Aug 2017 04:56
URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/3883

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.