Fundamental principles of an effective diabetic retinopathy screening program

Lanzetta, Paolo, Sarao, Valentina, Scanlon, Peter H ORCID: 0000-0001-8513-710X, Barratt, Jane, Porta, Massimo, Bandello, Francesco, Loewenstein, Anat, Eldem, Bora, Hunyor, Alex, Joussen, Antonia, Koh, Adrian, Korobelnik, Jean-François, Lanzetta, Paolo, Loewenstein, Anat, Lövestam-Adrian, Monica, Navarro, Rafael, Okada, Annabelle A., Pearce, Ian, Rodríguez, Francisco J., Staurenghi, Giovanni, Wolf, Sebastian and Wong, David T. (2020) Fundamental principles of an effective diabetic retinopathy screening program. Acta Diabetologica, 17. p. 516. ISSN 0940-5429 , doi:10.1007/s00592-020-01506-8

[img]
Preview
Text (Final published version)
8283-Scanlon-et-al-2020-Article_Fundamental-Principles-of-An-Effective.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (671kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness among working-age adults worldwide. Early detection and treatment are necessary to forestall vision loss from DR. METHODS: A working group of ophthalmic and diabetes experts was established to develop a consensus on the key principles of an effective DR screening program. Recommendations are based on analysis of a structured literature review. RESULTS: The recommendations for implementing an effective DR screening program are: (1) Examination methods must be suitable for the screening region, and DR classification/grading systems must be systematic and uniformly applied. Two-field retinal imaging is sufficient for DR screening and is preferable to seven-field imaging, and referable DR should be well defined and reliably identifiable by qualified screening staff; (2) in many countries/regions, screening can and should take place outside the ophthalmology clinic; (3) screening staff should be accredited and show evidence of ongoing training; (4) screening programs should adhere to relevant national quality assurance standards; (5) studies that use uniform definitions of risk to determine optimum risk-based screening intervals are required; (6) technology infrastructure should be in place to ensure that high-quality images can be stored securely to protect patient information; (7) although screening for diabetic macular edema (DME) in conjunction with DR evaluations may have merit, there is currently insufficient evidence to support implementation of programs solely for DME screening. CONCLUSION: Use of these recommendations may yield more effective DR screening programs that reduce the risk of vision loss worldwide.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy screening; Evidence-based recommendations; Telemedicine
Related URLs:
Subjects: R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology
Research Priority Areas: Sport, Exercise, Health & Wellbeing
Depositing User: Susan Turner
Date Deposited: 03 Apr 2020 15:06
Last Modified: 29 May 2020 09:30
URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/8283

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.