Dispute Resolution, Legal Reasoning and Good Governance: learning lessons from appeals on selection in sport

Ryall, Emily S ORCID: 0000-0002-6050-4353, Cooper, Jonathan and Ellis, Liz ORCID: 0000-0001-9628-8413 (2019) Dispute Resolution, Legal Reasoning and Good Governance: learning lessons from appeals on selection in sport. European Sport Management Quarterly. ISSN 1618-4742 (In Press)

[img] Text (Peer reviewed version)
6967 Ryall and Cooper (2019) Dispute Resolution, Legal Reasoning and Good Governance.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only (Publisher Embargo).
Available under License All Rights Reserved.

Download (122kB)

Abstract

Research Question: How do legal norms and reasoning processes, in relation to selection appeals, underpin the concepts of good governance and professionalism in sport? Research Methods: This is primarily a theoretical paper that outlines the reasoning techniques and methodology of law as an academic and professional discipline in interpreting, explaining and understanding arbitral decisions related to selection in sport. It draws upon four exemplar cases from the UK dispute resolution body, Sports Resolutions, to illustrate the over-arching norms and principles inherent in legal reasoning and demonstrate how they form part of the normative framework for good governance. Results and Findings: This paper demonstrates how legal reasoning processes, exemplified by dispute resolution cases, provide indicators of good governance in sport. It suggests that a basic understanding of key legal norms and the legal reasoning process would reduce the likelihood of arbitration and appeal against decisions made by SGBs. It concludes that there should be greater dissemination of arbitration decisions by dispute resolution services and that these decisions should be used as education and professional development tools to illustrate the way in which legal norms and reasoning processes are applied. Implications: This paper demonstrates the importance of legal norms and reasoning processes to the concept of good governance in sport. It illustrates how better knowledge and understanding of the way in which arbitral judgements are reached could facilitate improved policy creation and implementation, thereby enhancing good governance, increased professionalism and more robust decision making within SGBs.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Governance; Dispute resolution; Legal reasoning; Arbitration; Athlete selection
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports
K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > School of Sport and Exercise
Research Priority Areas: Sport, Exercise, Health & Wellbeing
Depositing User: Emily Ryall
Date Deposited: 02 Jul 2019 12:41
Last Modified: 09 Jul 2019 15:45
URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/6967

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.