The social amplification of risk on Twitter: the case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom

Fellenor, John and Barnett, Julie and Potter, Clive and Urquhart, Julie and Mumford, J.D. and Quine, C.P. (2016) The social amplification of risk on Twitter: the case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom. Journal of Risk Research. pp. 1-21. ISSN 1366-9877 (In Press)

[img] Text (online ahead of print version)
3 Fellenor et al 2017_Journal of Risk Research.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 March 2018. (Publisher Embargo).
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (763kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

It has long been recognised that the traditional media play a key role in representing risk and are a significant source of information which can shape how people perceive and respond to hazard events. Early work utilising the social amplification of risk framework (SARF) sought to understand the discrepancy between expert and lay perceptions of risk and patterns of risk intensification and attenuation with reference to the media. However, the advent of Web 2.0 challenges traditional models of communication. To date there has been limited consideration of social media within the SARF and its role in mediating processes of risk perception and communication. Against this backdrop, we focus on the social media platform Twitter to consider the social amplification of risk in relation to ash dieback disease (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus); a tree health issue that attracted intense media attention when it was first identified in the UK in 2012. We present an empirical analysis of 25,600 tweets in order to explore what people were saying about ash dieback on Twitter, who was talking about it and how they talked about it. Our discussion outlines the themes around which talk about ash dieback was orientated, the significance of users’ environmental ‘affiliations’ and the role of including links (URLs) to traditional media coverage. We utilise the notion of ‘piggybacking’ to demonstrate how information is customised in line with group/individual identities and interests and introduce the concept of the ‘frame fragment’ to illustrate how information is selected and moved around Twitter emphasising certain features of the messages. The paper affords a detailed consideration of the way in which people and organisations simultaneously appropriate, construct and pass on risk-relevant information. A conclusion is that social media has the potential to transform the media landscape within which the SARF was originally conceived, presenting renewed challenges for risk communication.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Social amplification of risk; Twitter; Social media; Tree health; Visual analytics; Risk communication
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GF Human geography. Human ecology. Anthropogeography
S Agriculture > SB Plant culture > SB599 Pests and diseases
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > Countryside and Community Research Institute
Research Priority Areas: Environmental Dynamics & Governance
Depositing User: Katie Hickford
Date Deposited: 04 Oct 2017 15:37
Last Modified: 05 Oct 2017 01:49
URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/4958

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.