Using scenario-based influence mapping to examine farmers’ biosecurity behaviour

Maye, Damian and Enticott, Gareth and Naylor, Rhiannon (2017) Using scenario-based influence mapping to examine farmers’ biosecurity behaviour. Land Use Policy, 66. pp. 265-277. ISSN 0264-8377

[img] Text (Peer reviewed version © Crown Copyright)
Using scenario-based influence mapping to examine farmers’ biosecurity behaviour.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 June 2018. (Publisher Embargo).
Available under License All Rights Reserved.

Download (855kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Understanding of farmers’ influences relating to biosecurity is surprisingly weak, beyond general remarks that farmers tend to trust their private vet. Previous studies have explored influences in relation to single issue events. There is a need for better methodologies to fully appreciate how farmers’ biosecurity practices are shaped. Using bovine Tuberculosis as a case study, this paper uses stakeholder mapping methods applied across different scenarios. The aim is to identify how farmers’ responses to animal disease policy are shaped by their relationships with different actors. Interviews were conducted with 50 farmers in three areas in England. Farmers were presented with four scenarios to control bovine TB: 1) a badger cull, 2) an oral badger vaccine, 3) a cattle vaccine and 4) a range of control measures. The results show that as things get more uncertain, government institutions become more influential. Government institutions and government vets are also important in situations where farmers do not consider themselves ‘experts’ i.e. vaccination as opposed to culling. The influence of other farmers was not universal; it differed between scenarios. These data show the value of scenario-based stakeholder mapping as a methodology that can enable biosecurity researchers to: more accurately and systematically determine stakeholder influence and understand how these influences change and evolve; understand the role of farmer biosecurity practices, the self-concept and ‘good farming’; and identify broader logics of biosecurity that influence and potentially frustrate animal disease policy goals.

Item Type: Article
Article Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Farmer behaviour; Social norms and influence; Good farming; Stakeholder analysis; Scenario-based influence mapping; Bovine Tuberculosis; England
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
S Agriculture > SF Animal culture > SF 951 Diseases of special classes of animals
Divisions: Schools and Research Institutes > Countryside and Community Research Institute
Research Priority Areas: Environmental Dynamics & Governance
Depositing User: Eloise Fresnay
Date Deposited: 19 Apr 2017 09:19
Last Modified: 13 Jul 2017 15:08
URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/4549

University Staff: Request a correction | Repository Editors: Update this record

University Of Gloucestershire

Bookmark and Share

Find Us On Social Media:

Social Media Icons Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Pinterest Linkedin

Other University Web Sites

University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2RH. Telephone +44 (0)844 8010001.